--- name: bug-triage description: "Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization." argument-hint: "[sprint | full | trend]" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit --- # Bug Triage This skill processes the open bug backlog into a prioritised, sprint-assigned action list. It distinguishes between **severity** (how bad is the impact?) and **priority** (how urgently must we fix it?), detects systemic trends, and ensures no critical bug is lost between sprints. **Output:** `production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md` **When to run:** - Sprint start — assign open bugs to the new sprint or backlog - After `/team-qa` completes and new bugs have been filed - When the bug count crosses 10+ open items --- ## 1. Parse Arguments **Modes:** - `/bug-triage sprint` — triage against the current sprint; assign fixable bugs to the sprint backlog; defer the rest - `/bug-triage full` — full triage of all bugs regardless of sprint scope - `/bug-triage trend` — trend analysis only (no assignment); read-only report - No argument — run sprint mode if a current sprint exists, else full mode --- ## 2. Load Bug Backlog ### Step 2a — Discover bug files Glob for bug reports in priority order: 1. `production/qa/bugs/*.md` — individual bug report files (preferred format) 2. `production/qa/bugs.md` — single consolidated bug log (fallback) 3. Any `production/qa/qa-plan-*.md` "Bugs Found" table (last resort) If no bug files found: > "No bug files found in `production/qa/bugs/`. If bugs are tracked in a > different location, adjust the glob pattern. If no bugs exist yet, there is > nothing to triage." Stop and report. Do not proceed if no bugs exist. ### Step 2b — Load sprint context Read the most recently modified file in `production/sprints/` to understand: - Current sprint number / name - Stories in scope (for assignment target) - Sprint capacity constraints (if noted) If no sprint file exists: note "No sprint plan found — assigning to backlog only." ### Step 2c — Load severity reference Read `.claude/docs/coding-standards.md` for severity/priority definitions if they exist. If they do not exist, use the standard definitions in Step 3. --- ## 3. Classify Each Bug For each bug, extract or infer: ### Severity (impact of the bug) | Severity | Definition | |----------|-----------| | **S1 — Critical** | Game crashes, data loss, or complete feature failure. Cannot proceed past this point. | | **S2 — High** | Major feature broken but game is still playable. Significant wrong behaviour. | | **S3 — Medium** | Feature degraded but a workaround exists. Minor wrong behaviour. | | **S4 — Low** | Visual glitch, cosmetic issue, typo. No gameplay impact. | ### Priority (urgency of the fix) | Priority | Definition | |----------|-----------| | **P1 — Fix this sprint** | Blocks QA, blocks release, or is regression from last sprint | | **P2 — Fix soon** | Should be resolved before the next major milestone | | **P3 — Backlog** | Would be good to fix, but no active blocking impact | | **P4 — Won't fix / Deferred** | Accepted risk or out of scope for current product scope | ### Assignment For each P1/P2 bug in `sprint` mode: - Identify which story or epic the fix belongs to - Check whether the current sprint has remaining capacity - If capacity exists: assign to sprint (`Sprint: [current]`) - If capacity is full: flag as `Priority overflow — consider pulling from sprint` For `full` mode: assign all P1 to current sprint, P2 to next sprint estimate, P3+ to backlog. ### Deviation check Flag bugs that suggest **systematic problems**: - 3+ bugs from the same system in the same sprint → "Potential design or implementation quality issue in [system]" - 2+ S1/S2 bugs in the same story → "Story may need to be reopened and re-reviewed before shipping" - Bug filed against a story marked Complete → "Regression in completed story — story should be re-opened in sprint tracking" --- ## 4. Trend Analysis After classifying all bugs, generate trend metrics: ### Volume trends - Total open bugs: [N] - Opened this sprint: [N] - Closed this sprint: [N] - Net change: [+N / -N] ### System hot spots - Which system has the most open bugs? - Which system has the highest S1/S2 ratio? ### Age analysis - How many bugs are older than 2 sprints? - Are any S1/S2 bugs un-assigned (sprint = none)? ### Regression indicator - Any bugs filed against previously-completed stories? - Count: [N] regression bugs (story reopened implied) --- ## 5. Generate Triage Report ```markdown # Bug Triage Report > **Date**: [date] > **Mode**: [sprint | full | trend] > **Generated by**: /bug-triage > **Open bugs processed**: [N] > **Sprint in scope**: [sprint name, or "N/A"] --- ## Triage Summary | Priority | Count | Notes | |----------|-------|-------| | P1 — Fix this sprint | [N] | [N] assigned to sprint, [N] overflow | | P2 — Fix soon | [N] | Scheduled for next sprint | | P3 — Backlog | [N] | Deferred | | P4 — Won't fix | [N] | Accepted risk | **Critical (S1/S2) unfixed count**: [N] --- ## P1 Bugs — Fix This Sprint | ID | System | Severity | Summary | Assigned to | Story | |----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|-------| | BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | [sprint] | [story path] | --- ## P2 Bugs — Fix Soon | ID | System | Severity | Summary | Target Sprint | |----|--------|----------|---------|---------------| | BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | Sprint [N+1] | --- ## P3/P4 Bugs — Backlog / Won't Fix | ID | System | Severity | Summary | Disposition | |----|--------|----------|---------|-------------| | BUG-NNN | [system] | S4 | [one-line description] | Backlog | --- ## Systemic Issues Flagged [List any patterns from Step 3 deviation check, or "None identified."] --- ## Trend Analysis **Volume**: [N] open / [+N] net change this sprint **Hot spot**: [system with most bugs] **Regressions**: [N] bugs against completed stories **Aged bugs (>2 sprints old)**: [N] [If N aged S1/S2 bugs > 0:] > ⚠️ [N] high-severity bugs have been open for more than 2 sprints without > assignment. These represent accepted risk that should be explicitly reviewed. --- ## Recommended Actions 1. [Most urgent action — usually "fix P1 bugs before QA hand-off"] 2. [Second action — usually "investigate [hot spot system] quality"] 3. [Third action — optional improvement] ``` --- ## 6. Write and Gate Present the report in conversation, then ask: "May I write this triage report to `production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md`?" Write only after approval. After writing: - If any S1 bugs are unassigned: "S1 bugs must be assigned before the sprint can be considered healthy. Run `/sprint-status` to see current capacity." - If regression bugs exist: "Regressions found — consider re-opening the affected stories in sprint tracking and running `/smoke-check` to re-gate." - If no P1 bugs exist: "No P1 bugs — build is in good shape for QA hand-off." Verdict: **COMPLETE** — triage report written. If user declined write: Verdict: **BLOCKED** — user declined write. --- ## Collaborative Protocol - **Never close or mark bugs Won't Fix without user approval** — surface them as P4 candidates and ask: "Are these acceptable as Won't Fix?" - **Never auto-assign to a sprint at capacity** — flag overflow and let the sprint owner decide what to pull - **Severity is objective; priority is a team decision** — present severity classifications as recommendations, not mandates - **Trend data is informational** — do not block work on trend findings alone; surface them as observations